All Things Considered, Should Egalitarian Movements Accept Philanthropic Funding?

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract Philanthropy is a contentious and often polarising topic within egalitarian social movements. There are good reasons for this. reliant on the inequalities inherent in capitalist system, fundamentally at odds with democratic relationships, can moderate or control activities of recipients. This article therefore starts from premise that philanthropy violates ideals very significant ways. However, it goes to suggest that, absent ruptural change would drastically weaken bases philanthropic wealth, there strategic contingent case its selective use so long as pushes existing configurations power more directions. In making this case, draws primarily work Wright (2010) but also recent developments political theory philanthropy. It calls critical literacy around combines an openness experimentation clear-eyed sense risks. respect, outlines specific conditions strategies movements should adopt if they pursue accept funding. Firstly, must deliberately articulate actively defend their transformative vision, clarifying process tactical place Secondly, resist funder conditionalities, preserve modes organising face practices which undermine participatory threaten relations care solidarity. The article’s chief contribution integrate normative insights lessons sociological literature movement-philanthropy relations, sake systematically untangling live troublesome issue praxis radical

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

All Things Considered, Taxes Drive the January Effect

The multitude of explanations for the January effect leaves the reader confused about its primary cause(s): is it tax-loss selling, window dressing, information, bid-ask bounce, or a combination of these causes? The confusion arises, in part, because evidence has generally been presented in support of a particular hypothesis though the same evidence may be consistent with another hypothesis. Fu...

متن کامل

Pnm-16: Endometriosis: Diagnosis and Intervention (All Things that A Midwife Should Know)

Background: To describe the evaluation and management of endometriosis for midwives.Materials and Methods: A narrative review was performed within articles published at “PubMed”, “Elsevier”, “SID” and original text books to reach the purpose. Results: Many infertile women presenting at infertility treatment centers suffer from “endometriosis”. The significant correlation between endometriosis a...

متن کامل

Hybrid Dynamics in Modelica: Should all Events be Considered Synchronous

The Modelica specification is ambiguous as to whether all the events are synchronous are not. Different interpretations are possible leading to considerable differences in the ways models should be constructed and compilers developed. In this paper we examine this issue and show that there exists an interpretation that is more appropriate than others leading to more efficient compilers. It turn...

متن کامل

Staphylococcus lugdunensis; a pathogen that should be considered in Iran

Background: Staphylococcus lugdunensis is Gram-positive cocci of the staphylococcaceae family. S. lugdunensis despite having a clotting factor (wall coagulase), was classified in the coagulase negative staphylococcus group (CoNS) for lack of free coagulase. Although this bacterium is part of the human normal flora, in terms of virulence, S. lugdunensis is in second place after S. aureus. S. lug...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Res Publica

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['0486-4700']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-023-09620-4